yepGhost is on my bucket list![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yepGhost is on my bucket list![]()
Just came in from shooting targets at 25 and 40 yards with mine in .22. It really is a sweet little carbine…Ghost is on my bucket list![]()
Love my Red Wolf. It's a gun I'll probably will never sell. Life is short. Let's enjoy all the guns we can get our hands onWell, I hate to admit it, but I prefer my Red Wolf, or my Delta Wolf overy Ghost.
You hit the nail on the head. I have zero bad things to say about these electronic rifles other than being electronic and expensive! If I was a wealthy slob (I have not spent much time behind an Alpha or Delta but in my limited exposure I liked them. I would really like an Alpha wolf in a red laminate stock. I just cannot justify the expense.
Do you guys think it is really the cost of the ammo or the cost of the rifle and its limitations? There are a number of rifles that can be had for $1000 less that can make the same (or more) power and can shoot pellets and slugs. They also don't require a programmer to tune them. To me a .30 is all about hunting and some longer-range target practice. It would not be my go-to plinking rifle. That might be another reason guys are not willing to spend the money on a DW or AW.
I don't own a .30 yet. I would like to add one to the collection. It would make a good long-range woodchuck rifle and with the correct amount of energy, allow for vitals shots. I generally stick to head shots with my .25s.
It seems to me that the .30 is growing in popularity overall. But with rifles from RTI, AGT and FX that are significantly cheaper and allow for more straightforward tunning are people just not spending the money on a Daystate? To say this another way, is it the caliber or the cost of the rifle?
John
not the amo i have a .30 not the cost of the rifle i have a EVOL its simple its electronics that alone diminishes the potention custimer base.I have not spent much time behind an Alpha or Delta but in my limited exposure I liked them. I would really like an Alpha wolf in a red laminate stock. I just cannot justify the expense.
Do you guys think it is really the cost of the ammo or the cost of the rifle and its limitations? There are a number of rifles that can be had for $1000 less that can make the same (or more) power and can shoot pellets and slugs. They also don't require a programmer to tune them. To me a .30 is all about hunting and some longer-range target practice. It would not be my go-to plinking rifle. That might be another reason guys are not willing to spend the money on a DW or AW.
I don't own a .30 yet. I would like to add one to the collection. It would make a good long-range woodchuck rifle and with the correct amount of energy, allow for vitals shots. I generally stick to head shots with my .25s.
It seems to me that the .30 is growing in popularity overall. But with rifles from RTI, AGT and FX that are significantly cheaper and allow for more straightforward tunning are people just not spending the money on a Daystate? To say this another way, is it the caliber or the cost of the rifle?
John
I think it's a bit of both, anyone willing to drop that kind of money on a kit is no doubt a serious enthusiasts. I for one could never understand these people who buy Cybertrucks...but im not a car enthusiasts. Lol My 20 year old Jeep does everything I want it to do and still squeezes every nickel out of my pocket.I have not spent much time behind an Alpha or Delta but in my limited exposure I liked them. I would really like an Alpha wolf in a red laminate stock. I just cannot justify the expense.
Do you guys think it is really the cost of the ammo or the cost of the rifle and its limitations? There are a number of rifles that can be had for $1000 less that can make the same (or more) power and can shoot pellets and slugs. They also don't require a programmer to tune them. To me a .30 is all about hunting and some longer-range target practice. It would not be my go-to plinking rifle. That might be another reason guys are not willing to spend the money on a DW or AW.
I don't own a .30 yet. I would like to add one to the collection. It would make a good long-range woodchuck rifle and with the correct amount of energy, allow for vitals shots. I generally stick to head shots with my .25s.
It seems to me that the .30 is growing in popularity overall. But with rifles from RTI, AGT and FX that are significantly cheaper and allow for more straightforward tunning are people just not spending the money on a Daystate? To say this another way, is it the caliber or the cost of the rifle?
John
Makes perfect sense to me.I don't think electronic guns really do anything better than a mechanical type gun, I currently own two and both are in .30 caliber. They are highly tunable, just in a different way and for some folks that's the fun...its just different. The number one reason I see people selling heavy calibers is because they are typically backyard shooters. They want a quiet backyard shooter but go out and purchased a big bore. Haha Then they ask what's the best moderator to quiet the gun down.....well, that big hole is going to be difficult to tame. I have the first .30 caliber Safari that was available here in the usa, I've used that for big game hunting as well as a coyote gun. Fantastic gun for both pellets and slugs. Currently that guns apart and getting some upgrades. I have a .30 AW that I haven't touched a thing with, shooting very close to 100 fpe that makes it nice for coyotes and I can turn it down with a few shots to 60fpe for rabbits and gain a bunch more shots. My vote is the market has migrated back into smaller calibers that are more cost effective for the majority of shooting people do.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.