Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Blackwolf Blackwolf and Sub-MOA Barrels Review

Franklink

HAM Expert
950
3,340
HAM Points
4,093.25
Country flag
Last edited:
Airguns of Arizona has asked me to do a deep dive into the Daystate Blackwolf, and a couple of Sub MOA barrels as well.

1760401371968.webp


I've reviewed a few of their guns in the past few years. Here are the links to them, in case you're new to the forums and/or haven't seen them prior.
(a good number of these were done prior to the advent of the HAM Community)
As evidenced in those links, I'm not the type of reviewer to make a box-opening video, shoot it a few times, and then try to act like I know anything about the gun. In contrast, I go in-depth, perhaps even more in-depth than some are interested in. And that's the plan with the Blackwolf and Sub-MOA barrels. This has the potential to be an extensive series of posts about the gun and barrels.

There's no retailer or manufacturer oversight in my postings when I do a review. I share my impressions, pros and cons, warts and all. For full disclosure, I don't get paid for my reviews, although I was gifted the Ghost when I asked if I could purchase it after we had spent a pile of time together and I wanted it in my collection for continued use.

Now, on to what I was sent, and my very preliminary first impressions....

What I was sent...
A Daystate Blackwolf, chassis version, with an OEM 28inch/700mm barrel in .22. AOA has it listed as a "HiLite Chassis" on their website.

Daystate Blackwolf .22 HiLite Black Chassis 28" Barrel: Airguns of Arizona | Premier Airgun Store

The following accompanied the gun...
  • The 28" barrel OEM barrel, which appears to be a true polygonal rifled bore. I'm told this is a 1:17.7" twist rate. It also has the tensioning system new to the BW platform. At a future point I will share detailed photos of that tensioning system. And of course accuracy results of how that barrel performs.
  • A 24 and 5/8" barrel, also in .22, from the relatively new-to-the industry Sub MOA barrel manufacturer. This is a 1:22 twist rate. I was told the intention here is pellets, but that this configuration also performs well with certain slugs in their testing.
  • An additional Sub MOA barrel, same length, also in .22, but with a 1:16 twist rate. I was told this is a slug barrel.
  • Both of these Sub MOAbarrels are:
    • Cerakoted black to match the gun
    • have spiral fluting
    • tapered, with a diameter of 0.981" at the largest, and tapering down to 0.692" at the muzzle.
    • HEAVY and SUBSTANTIAL, and visually striking, especially paired with a 0DB moderator with a similar spiral pattern.
    • They strongly remind me of a firearm barrel.
  • A moderator adaptor was supplied for the Sub-MOA barrels, standard 1/2x20 male threads.
  • A set of hammer springs (blue, white, red I believe)
  • Finally, the gun arrived with a bare .177 barrel that will eventually go on to @cavedweller. He worked out a deal to have this barrel machined by mutual friend @Arzrover. This is a standard twist, 12 land and groove Lothar barrel, from the Sterling Armaments days, so 20-25 years ago. The .20 cal barrel in my Ghost and reported on extensively in the link above is also a Sterling/LW barrel, and is exceptional. This .177 has big shoes to fill. @Arzrover machined a .177 Sterling sister to this barrel for his .22 to .177 EVOL conversion, and reports that the one in his EVOL is as good as barrels get.
PXL_20251011_050942158.jpg



First Impressions and General Ramblings...
VERY prelim thoughts here but this is where I'm at so far...Much of this info was gathered and shared by @Arzrover in the week that he had the gun. He and I had scheduled a day to shoot prairie dogs at my place and AOA made him a Blackwolf mule to get the gun to me.

I've shot the gun less than 100 times, maybe even less than 75 times, not even two full fills to be precise. All with the 1:22 MOA barrel and pellets. About half of those shots were at 50 yards, and the other roughly half were at 100 yards.

Prior to shooting it I swapped the grip out. Personal preference, but I've found I just don't love that 90 degree angled grip that seems to be the current rage. The BW accepts standard AR grips. I went with a finger-grooved grip that I've found I like.

I also needed to scope it. I went with a 20x SWFA. This will primarily be a bench gun. And I've found the simple 20x SWFAs turrets to track true, eliminating the scope as a confounding factor. Yes, the BW probably deserves better glass. And no, I'm not a scope snob, being fairly tolerant of just using what works. The most likely scope upgrade it would get would be going to an Athlon Midas Tac 6-24x50, stolen from one of my personal guns.

Added a couple picatinny rails to the MLOK channel in the fore-end, end-goal here was to be able to shoot it from a bipod.

I dug around in my scope mount orphan bin and found a set of the correct height that will allow me to access the two grub screws that hold the barrel, without needing to remove the scope. The grub screws come down from the top of the breech block on the BW, similar to a Red Wolf. This scope mounting situation will allow barrel swaps (reminder that I was sent 4!!! barrels) without pulling the scope off of the gun.

PXL_20251010_173152480.jpg




Overall length with the 24 and 5/8" SubMOA barrel, plus a 0DB moderator in the 110 size is just shy of 47inches. Yes, it's a long gun.

Bobby recorded some weights and shared them....
  • The SubMOA barrels weigh 3lbs, 3.8ounces (remember I said SUBSTANTIAL).
  • The 28inch OEM barrel weighs 2lb, 8.6ounces
  • AOA website lists the BW as 9.5lbs with the 28 inch barrel. That would be un-scoped.
  • Total scoped weight Bobbie recorded was 11lbs, 14oz. That was the SubMOA barrel and an Athlon 5-25 scope that he had on it briefly (probably in the 25ounce range).
Some Cons (in my opinion) that I've found so far
  • The bottle is not valved like a Ghost bottle. Degas means losing all the air.
  • Lowering the regulator pressure requires a degas.
  • Barrel machining is different than the Ghost/Alpha and Delta Wolf-was hoping for cross compatibility of barrels here.
  • Magazines are also not cross-compatible between the BW and Ghost/Alpha and Delta Wolfs.
  • Action has to be removed from chassis (or stock) to be able to swap hammer springs.
  • Safety has to be removed from action to be able to pull action from chassis. (I'm not a safety guy, as I choose to single-feed and de-cock almost exclusively. So the safety will just stay in a baggy in the case while the gun is with me.)

Some Pros (again, in light of this being very preliminary)
  • Feels more solidly built than a Red Wolf and/or Ghost, Bobby and I both got this impression from our short times with it.
  • Shot cycle is MUCH improved over the Ghost. That was one of my criticisms of the Ghost. Much less of the "kachunkity schlunk" Ghost feel when a projectile is fired from the Blackwolf.
  • Trigger is better than the Ghost. Another of my Ghost criticisms. I've yet to even adjust anything on the BW trigger, and it is out of the box a better feeling trigger than the Ghost. More crisp, more predictable. It's easily under a pound as-is. And Bobby told me he didn't do any trigger fiddling.
  • VERY enjoyable bench gun, which might go back to the shot cycle being so docile, even at pretty high power.
  • Power potential. This thing is ROCKING! and that's without even trying very hard. I'll include an image of the chrono testing from Daystate, but they were getting 988fps with the .22/34grain pellets, and I wouldn't be surprised to learn they weren't leaning on it very hard. It's making more power than I'm typically interested in, without even pushing it.
Initial Accuracy Results
This was a handful of groups at 50 yards, mostly with the intent of zeroing the scope. The larger printed circles are just under 0.75." Only tried three different weights of pellets, all JSB: the 20.83, the 25.4, and the 28.55. I was blowing out the back of my rubber mulch pellet traps. This was with a reg pressure of 175bar (as shipped), and the blue hammer spring. This was so unofficial that I didn't even have a chronograph out. I suspect the 20.83s were close to 1100 fps. Best accuracy seemed to be from the Grands with the hammer wheel at 10, which still might have been too fast.

PXL_20251010_205100588.jpg



Then this was with the Grands at 100 yards. That last (bottom right) group had 3/5 into the same bout 1/2".

PXL_20251010_204954943.jpg



Scores were arrived at with this method...

PXL_20251010_205013696.jpg

No, this initial session isn't showing any earth shaking accuracy. This is the absolute definition of quick and dirty, undertaken just to get on the gun a bit. I will need to get serious enough about it to get out the chrono and figure out a general "tune" and what the barrel likes. From the speeds that 1:17.7 and 1:30/32 barrels like, I suspect I'll find best accuracy around 900-930 from this 1:22 barrel, but that is of course variable with the projectile that I'm shooting.

The following are a couple images from the manual that I found interesting.
PXL_20251013_031217750.jpg

PXL_20251013_032347626.jpg

PXL_20251013_032332139.jpg

PXL_20251013_032315620.jpg



Conclusion
I'm a bit overwhelmed at the number of permutations possible with this gun, the barrels, the reg pressure, the hammer springs, various projectiles, etc. Along the same lines of how many hundreds of thousands of words are in the English language, starting from an alphabet of only 26 letters, arranged in various ways....The variables with this review of the Blackwolf combine to create a VAST potential for testing and tinkering and subsequently reporting the results. Current plan is to work through some of those, and share the results here. Having an often more than full-time job, and kids and a wife, I'll test and share as time allows.
 
Pass the popcorn and hang onto your seats!!🥳 You mentioned an upcoming gun review, it never dawned on me it could be the balckwolf. I am glad you are comparing it to the Ghost, as you know that platform very well. As far as I know they are the exact same barrels as the other recent Daystate/Ghost platforms, same length & twist just machined differently as you said. Real curious at what speed accuracy will fall apart with mrds in the 1:17 L.W. barrel vs the 1:32. The degas/reg adjust/refill bottle thing is a forehead smacker.....c'mon daystate!🙄 🤦‍♂️
+1 for the Ghost lol.
Question! Does that gun fit in that case?
 
Pass the popcorn and hang onto your seats!!🥳 You mentioned an upcoming gun review, it never dawned on me it could be the balckwolf. I am glad you are comparing it to the Ghost, as you know that platform very well. As far as I know they are the exact same barrels as the other recent Daystate/Ghost platforms, same length & twist just machined differently as you said. Real curious at what speed accuracy will fall apart with mrds in the 1:17 L.W. barrel vs the 1:32. The degas/reg adjust/refill bottle thing is a forehead smacker.....c'mon daystate!🙄 🤦‍♂️
+1 for the Ghost lol.
Question! Does that gun fit in that case?

Yeah, the non-valved bottles is a step backwards. They may have a good reason for it, but I prefer a valved bottle.

The slow twist .22 barrel in my Ghost is a 1:30 I believe. And it likes 950-960 with MRDs. Yes, I too am curious about the difference in the relationship between accuracy, speed, and twist rates here. Eventually I'll get to that comparison.

Good question on the gun in the case. The perspective is skewed with the gun being closer than the case in that photo, like when somebody holds a snake or a fish at arms length to o make it look bigger when someone takes a photo. . It came to me in that case, with that barrel installed, and with a slightly bigger scope installed (Bobby's scope). So, yes, it will fit. It didn't have the moderator on it though, so I can't confirm that it fits with the moderator threaded on.
 
Yeah, the non-valved bottles is a step backwards. They may have a good reason for it, but I prefer a valved bottle.

Where I was going with that is that they may have run into "flow" issues. The Red Wolfs are basically full bottle volume and pressure on the guns firing valve. As in, in a Red Wolf, the bottle itself is somewhat plenum volume. A bottle valve might create some flow issues, or maybe even refill rate issues? Because it's another potential point of restriction or reduction of flow between the guns firing valve and the air source (the bottle).
So the power potential of the Black Wolf might have necessitated the omission of a bottle valve for some reason. Just hypothesizing here, no hard data on that possible reason for no bottle valve.
 
Last edited:
None valved bottle makes it easier for flights to events like EBR. The valves were installed from the factory with loctite and very difficult to get out when you needed to remove the bottle for flights.

Just got my Blackwolf with SubMOA barrel in .30 caliber and loving it. Still some work to do but here is a sample group from a full 8 round magazine that I got during my first hour of playing with it at 100 yards, 960 fps using JSB 44 grain pellets.

IMG_3069.webpIMG_3068.webpIMG_3070.webp
 
The slow twist .22 barrel in my Ghost is a 1:30 I believe. And it likes 950-960 with MRDs. Yes, I too am curious about the difference in the relationship between accuracy, speed, and twist rates here. Eventually I'll get to that comparison.
Ah my bad 1:30** (I believe the Rti Prophet is the 1:32) My Ghost with the 1:30 shoots best at a blazing 975fps.... looking forward to the barrel testing more so than the blackwolf itself, lol.
You do you, but I'd probably test it with the factory barrel only and then once you have the gun figured out move on to the SubMoa stuff.....gonna be a ton of data! Maybe you'll find a winner with .22 slugs finally. 🤩
 
The trigger was even lighter than I estimated.

This was a 5-6 pull average....4.9 ounces. No wonder I was liking what I was feeling during that first shooting session.
PXL_20251014_071651540.webp

I played musical chairs with the trigger gauge on a couple other guns and a 5-6 average on one of my Veterans was 3.6ounzes, and the average was 8.1ounces on the testbed Ghost. The Blackwolf trigger feels about right in the middle of those two for effort on the final break, so the general feel lines up with what the trigger pull gauge is saying. Of note, the first stage is a bit stiffer than I'd like on the BW, so will lighten that up slightly at some future point. As far as the break itself, I generally start to get pretty happy when a trigger break is under 5-6ounces, as long as it breaks clean, without the draggy/catchy/gronchy feel that some triggers have. Quite happy with the BW trigger, without even adding the qualifier of "out of the box." Considering this is how it came, MUCH better than a typical "out of the box" trigger. And I think I can make it suit my preferences even more by lightening up the first stage (B in the trigger diagram above), and perhaps tweaking that second stage travel screw (E in above diagram) to see what effect that has on final break effort, as well as feel. I'll also move the entire trigger blade rearward, via F, and I like to turn the trigger pad a bit to match the angle that my trigger finger lands on it, when a gun allows it, which will be adjustment G.
 
Ah my bad 1:30** (I believe the Rti Prophet is the 1:32) My Ghost with the 1:30 shoots best at a blazing 975fps.... looking forward to the barrel testing more so than the blackwolf itself, lol.
You do you, but I'd probably test it with the factory barrel only and then once you have the gun figured out move on to the SubMoa stuff.....gonna be a ton of data! Maybe you'll find a winner with .22 slugs finally. 🤩
Yes there was a pellet barrel that was 1:32 for RTI but obviously their Proprietary is the 1:16 for .22. great slug barrel.
 
Last edited:
Really looking forward to this. I have owned a couple RWs, a DW, and a couple Ghosts the last several years. The BW on paper was exactly what I wanted and had been waiting for. Unfortunately the DW and the Ghosts left a lot to be desired and with the price increase to the BW, I still haven’t purchased one. Those misses and that high price turned me away. On top of that, I haven’t seen any reviews that have led me to believe I am missing out either. I am eager to see how it goes for you. I have enjoyed following along with your reviews over the years.

I wish SubMOA had not continued with that tapered barrel. I personally do not like the look of it. I bought an Evol with the tapered barrel and it looks as goofy in person as it does in pics.

Side note… also happy it is in 22!!
 
I'm looking forward to this thread developing as well...
I only got a few days with it and probably a few hundred shots. Not enough time for much real testing as machining that 177 and playing pickleball with the wife took quite a bit of time too. Really seems like one of Daystate's best efforts yet. There's a LOT to like but @Franklink will be much better and more thorough about communicating it.
I like the chassis a lot but it's not light. Will be a great bench rifle for sure...
Bob
 
Really looking forward to this. I have owned a couple RWs, a DW, and a couple Ghosts the last several years. The BW on paper was exactly what I wanted and had been waiting for. Unfortunately the DW and the Ghosts left a lot to be desired and with the price increase to the BW, I still haven’t purchased one. Those misses and that high price tuned me away. On top of that, I haven’t seen any reviews that have led me to believe I am missing out either. I am eager to see how it goes for you. I have enjoyed following along with your reviews over the years.

I wish SubMOA had not continued with that tapered barrel. I personally do not like the look of it. I bought an Evol with the tapered barrel and it looks as goofy in person as it does in pics.

Side note… also happy it is in 22!!

There's some weight reduction in the tapered barrel, and even with that, they're still heavy dudes.

The overall aesthetics that the taper imparts to a gun are certainly a personal preference. I like it.

And yeah, I've shot the big .30 airguns, and it just doesn't do much for me the way the .22 and below do. Again, just personal preference.
 
I think the .22 cal 28 inch 1:16 will be an impressive slug shooter. I have a 28 inch 1:15.75 LW in my Skout Evo, and it shoots the AirMarksman ACE 40.1 grain lights out at 900 fps.
I also recently got a .30 SubMOA 1:40 barrel for the Black Wolf but have only put a few hundred pellets through it. Seems to like the AEA 45 best at 940 fps but that’s just preliminary. The factory 23 inch LW poly 1:30 is very good FYI.
As far as the bottle valve that doesn’t make much sense but there must be a reason. The bottle goes to the Huma reg then plenum then valve, so it doesn’t appear to be based on flow like the Red Wolf.
The .30 BW is a powerhouse. It’s more powerful than my Skouts, and about on par with the FX Dynamic/Panthera platforms. And FYI, there is no need for the space shuttle rocket booster plenum. It’s more than powerful enough without it.
 
Late night fiddling in the gun room...

With Rudy's 19.5" .177 barrel + a thread adaptor + 110 0db moderator, title length is 41.75" and MUCH lighter.
(Thread adaptor to get from the Daystate/BRK standard 1x14 muzzle threads to 1/2x20 moderator threads).
PXL_20251015_063430804.webp

Measurement from butt stock to end of 480cc bottle is 32."
Could technically put a 14-15" barrel on it to get a fairly compact gun, of course losing some fpe with the reduction in barrel length. But 32" OAL starts to put us into CONVENIENT length.

PXL_20251015_063804060.webp
 
Some barrel cleaning and inspecting...

Cleaning station..
PXL_20251015_073036373.webp

First patch and 4th patch. I know of at least a couple hundred shots through this particular barrel, between Bobby and myself. Maybe a couple really tiny flecks of lead, but glad to see it's not all glittered up.
PXL_20251015_065916855.webp

Tried really hard to get some good macro photos of the rifling on the SubMOA barrels but things just weren't cooperating.

I added five dots to show where the lands are. Can really only see the three b/c the camera lens isnt squared up to the bore. Not very pronounced lands, which equates to less land impressions on a flying projectile, which theoretically equates to less "grabbers" for the air molecules to get ahold of while it's flying.
PXL_20251015_070921773~2.webp

And some shots of pellets pushed through. I'm liking to see that light ring of contact around the head of the pellets. That means we're not over-bored. With some barrels, that's often why there's a choke, to account for sections of the barrel that are larger than they should be. But there are no chokes in these SubMOA barrels.
Macro photos of pellets really show you how imperfect they are, coming out of the tin.

PXL_20251015_073727183.webp
PXL_20251015_073456276.webpScreenshot_20251015-003515.webpPXL_20251015_073753919.webpPXL_20251015_073636918.webpScreenshot_20251015-004402.webpScreenshot_20251015-004429.webp
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create FREE account

Create a FREE account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Trending in this forum

Back
Top