Scriv
Master HAMster
Last edited:
That's what I said, the Laminate. You can't really compare the TAC to the Carbon Grey. Assuming that they took cosmetically flawed stocks, and painted them gray so as to not have to throw them out, that would allow them to offer the rifles at a "reduced" price. And, if you'll concede that it would also cost more to produce the tool free, highly adjustable buttstock on the TAC that would account for some difference. Also, when you consider that the full length rail allowing for multiple attachment points for lord knows what costs significantly more as evidenced by the many aftermarket vendors that sell them for at least a couple of hundred bucks, that has to account for some cost difference. After considering all of that, you come to the barrel. The Carbon gray is the only rifle in the line up that does not come with the tensioned barrel. It is an option on that rifle. To be honest, I have not done much research into these high tech barrels, but it wouldn't be hard to imagine that they are at least $500. Yes, I compared the TAC to the Laminate (as stated in my previous post) because that rifle was most closely equipped to the TAC. I compared 17" barrel rifles with cylinders because that's what I was interested in so my numbers may be a bit different.Look again… you are comparing it to the already massive price increase to the Laminate…