Well, I bought a Sonoran .30, because it has a Sub-MOA barrel. I shot it and was very impressed with the accuracy. Then it seemed like it would foul relatively quickly and the accuracy would fall apart. I put a bore scope down it and wasn’t impressed with the deep serrations across the lands. I admit I got fixated on the bore scope and another forum/thread discussing the same tooling marks and ignored my actual real world accuracy. AOA stepped up and replaced the barrel. The barrel shipped a week later than I was told it would ship, because it needed more polishing. That made me think that the they had taken another barrel with the same tooling marks and cycled it through a vertical lapping machine a lot of times. I say that because the lands in the second barrel are barely perceptible. The truth is, I don’t know that it really matters with either barrel. If you look at the attached bore shots, you would never know that they were both manufactured by Sub-MOA to the same specs. I’ve shot sub 1/2 MOA 101yd groups with both barrels in no wind conditions, with off the shelf pellets. I’m pretty sure I’ve shot .3” 101yd groups with at least one of the barrels. I’m considering selling my Sonoran, not because I’m unhappy with it, but because I really want to buy The AAA HPS benchrest rifle in .30 when it’s available. I’ve spoken to several AAA owners and they all praise the workmanship and quality of Toms rifles. Tristian’s video of To s business left a positive impression too. Looking at my real world results with the Sub-MOA barrel and marrying that to a purpose built rifle should be quite a package. The first two obit are the second barrel, the third is the first barrel and then several 1/2 MOA groups with different pellets- shows that they are both very capable barrels. I’m only posting this, because in some of my previous posts I’ve been pretty hard on Sub-MOA and I wanted update/clarify my opinion.
View attachment 20084View attachment 20085View attachment 20089View attachment 20090View attachment 20091View attachment 20092View attachment 20093