Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Airgun Theory Bb myth

Nordic Norm

HAM Specialist
98
207
HAM Points
489.50
Country flag
Hi folks. Bbs are a loose fit in the barrel. They will literally fall out by gravity if it weren't for the magnetic probe in rifles. So how is it they are accurate? It is common belief that bbs will bounce down the bore eventually damaging it. I don't believe this bouncing theory. For one, the accuracy would be terrible. More importantly, if one looks at aerodynamic theory the Bartolli effect (if I remember the title correctly) will keep the bb flaoting centered in the boar. The bb doesn't contact the boar. High pressure air leaking around the bb will keep it centered as explained in aerodynamic theory. As the bb shifts off center, the increased volume on one side causes pressure to drop, on the opposite side the volume decreases and the pressure increases. This effect instantly and continuously corrects minute errors in the bbs flight thru the barrel. This is also how airplanes and helicopters fly. It would be difficult to observe bbs coming down the barrel. Probably dangerous also. What do you folks think? Am I missing something?
 
Norm, thanks for raising a very interesting topic. My interest is in the interface between theory and practical performance. That's why HAM specializes in measuring things as much, as consistently and as precisely as we can.

So I would appreciate your comments on the results of practical accuracy and manufacturing consistency of BBs that are published here:


 
Norm, thanks for raising a very interesting topic. My interest is in the interface between theory and practical performance. That's why HAM specializes in measuring things as much, as consistently and as precisely as we can.

So I would appreciate your comments on the results of practical accuracy and manufacturing consistency of BBs that are published here:


It would follow aerodynamic theory that roundness matters most. The less spherical a bb the more aerodynamic correction oscillation is induced. It would be difficult to examine bbs for sphericalness (may be a new word). Probably require an expensive machine
 
It would follow aerodynamic theory that roundness matters most. The less spherical a bb the more aerodynamic correction oscillation is induced. It would be difficult to examine bbs for sphericalness (may be a new word). Probably require an expensive machine
Agreed - that's why we don't do that. But maybe there's something about the ASG Blaster manufacturing process that gives improved sphericity? That could be another new word...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Interesting topic. The glass syringes video link above talks about this same thing.
 
Hi folks. Bbs are a loose fit in the barrel. They will literally fall out by gravity if it weren't for the magnetic probe in rifles. So how is it they are accurate? It is common belief that bbs will bounce down the bore eventually damaging it. I don't believe this bouncing theory. For one, the accuracy would be terrible. More importantly, if one looks at aerodynamic theory the Bartolli effect (if I remember the title correctly) will keep the bb flaoting centered in the boar. The bb doesn't contact the boar. High pressure air leaking around the bb will keep it centered as explained in aerodynamic theory. As the bb shifts off center, the increased volume on one side causes pressure to drop, on the opposite side the volume decreases and the pressure increases. This effect instantly and continuously corrects minute errors in the bbs flight thru the barrel. This is also how airplanes and helicopters fly. It would be difficult to observe bbs coming down the barrel. Probably dangerous also. What do you folks think? Am I missing something?
What you may be thinking of is the Bernoulli effect, Bartoli produced a theory on radiation pressure, nothing to do with aerodynamics. The Bernoulli effect will only really work if one side of the BB is in contact with the barrel, stopping part of the flow. As soon as there is a gap, as long as the gap is bigger than the boundary layer thickness, the suction on each side of the BB will equalize, the volume has little effect.

When the BB contacts the barrel, friction will induce spin, which will complicate matters somewhat, but may help the effect you are thinking of. None of it is instantaneous.
 
What you may be thinking of is the Bernoulli effect, Bartoli produced a theory on radiation pressure, nothing to do with aerodynamics. The Bernoulli effect will only really work if one side of the BB is in contact with the barrel, stopping part of the flow. As soon as there is a gap, as long as the gap is bigger than the boundary layer thickness, the suction on each side of the BB will equalize, the volume has little effect.

When the BB contacts the barrel, friction will induce spin, which will complicate matters somewhat, but may help the effect you are thinking of. None of it is instantaneous.
Thanks, I remembered the name incorrectly. The volume I refer to is the gap between the bb and bore.
 
If an oscilloscope was hooked up to a test barrel, then any oscillation/vibration could be measured. It wouldn't matter if the vibration comes from bb barrel contact or aerodynamic effects. If the vibration level corresponds to accuracy, ie low vibration, high accuracy, then it could be a reliable indicator of sphericalness. In addition, the magnitude of the vibration would likely indicate a looser or tighter fit. The frequency would likely indicate roundness.
 
The Bernoulli (thanks Miles_M) effect could be observed using a clear tube and a lightweight ball proportional to a bb fit in a barrel. Set the tube vertically, air injects into the bottom, drop in the ball and play around with it. Does the ball touch the tube? Different velocities from a balance to hundreds of fps could be observed. Horizontal testing at higher speeds could be done using a a high speed movie camera. It wouldn't be precisely the same as what is happening inside the actual bb rifle, but similarities surely would be observed
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Interesting topic. The glass syringes video link above talks about this same thing.
aplies to some of our better tool grinding fixture we use.
i think it as an air bearing effect?
not a 100%
 
I have quite a few smoothbore bb shooters so I don't experiment with them in my rifled barrels. This one is probably my favorite after I spent some time customizing it. 200 shots per cartridge and pretty accurate too. 58409.webp
 
I have a Berra 1866. It will shoot bbs very accurately with 2 pumps or more. With 1 pump bb accuracy is terrible. Pellets accuracy is great with only 1 pump. My hypothesis is, with a bb and 1 pump there isn't enough blowby air around the bb to aerodynamically float the bb in the barrel. With 2 pumps or more, the blowby air is enough to float the bb in the bore. The accuracy goes from wild bad to excellent, bb 1 pump vs 2pumps, it doesn't get progressively better with more pumps. Bbs are a loose fit in the barrel, they roll thru unimpeded. Pellets contact the barrel and are therefore unaffected by the low pressure of a single pump.
Shooting indoors, 15 ft.
What do you think?
 
Haven't done much with bb pushers in quite a while now but have been sorely tempted by the Barra 400E...Full auto and semi auto function-410 fps with excellent accuracy and electrically driven....no co2 cartridges to buy but it is a bit over$400.....
 
Haven't done much with bb pushers in quite a while now but have been sorely tempted by the Barra 400E...Full auto and semi auto function-410 fps with excellent accuracy and electrically driven....no co2 cartridges to buy but it is a bit over$400.....
My Berra 1866 shoots Daisy premium grade bbs so well it isn't worth trying to load pellets in it.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create FREE account

Create a FREE account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Trending in this forum

Back
Top