- Original poster
- #41
Well it did do rather well with the 218 h&n problem there is i have mostly 217 slugs! No one seems to have h&n in stock except heavy slugsThey can’t all be track drivers, what would we have to complain about…![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well it did do rather well with the 218 h&n problem there is i have mostly 217 slugs! No one seems to have h&n in stock except heavy slugsThey can’t all be track drivers, what would we have to complain about…![]()
Well thats the thing im only in the 55 fpe range. I think fx listed the mki 700 in the 79 fpe range. I can’t imagine the huma port being bigger than this either it is rather largeI think that it is doing well for what it is. Your plenum still isn't that big compared to the big one on a Dynamic, your hammer is still stock, and I am sure your transfer port isn't a high flow Huma either, I think Gerhard said in that video that it's now the standard sized Dynamic one. And, you haven't put your reg really up there yet either, so you have a ways to go. My Dynamic block is maxed out in every way except for a tungsten hammer (but it is heavier than standard), reg at 155b, and I'm doing between 78 to 85fpe depending on slug weight. The .218 diameter is what my barrel likes too, especially so with H&N. If you're getting in the 68fpe range with your current setup that's actually pretty good, and very much what I would be expecting.
In stock form. I believe they are exaggerating. here's a picture I posted of the standard Dynamic port next to a Huma full flow port and the difference is big.Well thats the thing im only in the 55 fpe range. I think fx listed the mki 700 in the 79 fpe range.
Yeah, I want to see an unboxing video, of a new gun, where they manage that (88fpe w/40.5gr). Seriously, PA, do one!This is what pyramid lists it as
View attachment 21452
Wow! Some real compromises and some real benefits to both versions. The one Rick is shooting in that video, he says he can't shoot bigger than. 34gr slug in the factory mag either. It seems to me you don't actually need the shp for more power. The MkII's 53cc plenum has obviously found a way to bend physics. My plenum in my Dynamic is 156cc and I have bigger porting and I make the same 88fpe with 40.5gr ammo has the MkII does already, according to PA, that's plenty. If yours isn't doing that maybe you should send it back to themI just checked too you can’t use the shp plenum on the mkii as the plenum now screws on with 2 screws instead of 4.
Yea not enough hammer the spring is maxed out hammer only weighs 10 gram. Something else is weird too just checked shot count 29 shots watching velocity but air gauge says i shot down to 120 bar reg at 140 and it went to 120 tooWow! Some real compromises and some real benefits to both versions. The one Rick is shooting in that video, he says he can't shoot bigger than. 34gr slug in the factory mag either. It seems to me you don't actually need the shp for more power. The MkII's 53cc plenum has obviously found a way to bend physics. My plenum in my Dynamic is 156cc and I have bigger porting and I make the same 88fpe with 40.5gr ammo has the MkII does already, according to PA, that's plenty. If yours isn't doing that maybe you should send it back to them
All joking aside, just looking into this briefly, I believe you are right and your numbers should be better. At least as good as what Rick was doing in that video. You may not have as much plenum but the porting is better in your new one. You can make up for less plenum by increasing your pressure, to a point. Try your reg at 160 if you have enough hammer spring for it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.