Interesting discussion! I'd like to comment on a couple of points raised above...
I agree that improved materials and engineering are part of the price difference between a $1K and $2.5K air rifle. But there are more, including gun-to-gun consistency (AKA quality control), warranty and support, together with brand presence and even just looks. Each of us will have our own specific opinions of the value of these things.
Are these things necessary? Maybe not. At least not unless you are unfortunate enough to receive a "lemon". Can they make some of us feel better about our purchase? They sure can, hence the vast sales of high-end products of all types - not just airguns - with premium brand names. Again, we all make our own calls and $3K is a lot of money for most of us.
With regard to the "Karma EQ will outshoot my Blackwolf" comment, or similar. It's important to remember that a huge number of YouTube reviews are "bought". The video review business (again for all types of products, not just airguns) is based on reviewers being paid - usually before the video is published. If you were being paid to run a review for a certain product, would you say it was junk? Really?
In this respect, I would like to stress that Hard Air Magazine does not charge for reviews. Sure we have advertisers - you can all see who they are - and of course we give them priority in scheduling our limited review time. But HAM reviews themselves are not "bought". We say exactly what we want and prove it with as much data as possible.
And finally
@SpindleB , please note that you have not got into trouble with the moderators here for asking a reasonable question in a reasonable manner!