Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Unregulated Gen. 1 Barra 1100z Performance .177 Caliber

1747164773517.webp

Today Doug Wall explores unregulated Barra 1100z performance in .177 Caliber. He’s using the Gen. 1 gun that started-out in .22 caliber.

Having made the caliber change, Doug’s testing follows the same methodology as he used for Part One of this saga. This enables to compare the performance of the same gun in different calibers. It’s also a new baseline to compare with the gun’s regulated performance in a future installment.



Today’s Testing​


In this part, I’ll go through a similar set of shot strings as in part one, to see the effect of hammer spring adjustments on velocity, shot string, and energy. As mentioned before, my goal is to get the gun set up at just under 20 Ft/Lbs energy.

As in the previous article, I will be starting the pressure at about 3,000 PSI, and going down to about 1,500 PSI.

Again, for as much compatibility as possible, I’ll be using H&N Baracuda pellets. This time it’s the 8.44 Grain Baracuda 8. These were also a HAM Gold Award winner for their manufacturing consistency.

There’s no point in testing with low quality ammo!

H&N Baracuda 8 Pellet Test Review


I like these pellets and have found them to be accurate in many of my personal air rifles. For that sub-20 Ft/Lbs requirement, we’ll need to have these pellets traveling with a maximum Muzzle Velocity of 1,030 FPS.

Barra 1100z Performance – Power Tune​


Shot string one is at the previous “power tune” setting of about eight turns in. Again, we see a relatively small number of high-powered shots with a constantly-dropping velocity.

Barra 1100z Performance .177 Caliber


As with the .22 caliber testing, now we’ll take the same graph and add pressure gauge readings to it (the purple bars). As we can see, both pressure and FPS drop together.

Barra 1100z Performance .177 Caliber


Although this may be a reasonable hunting tune, it’s clearly unsuitable for my 20 Ft/Lbs Field Target goal. No surprise there!

Barra 1100z Performance – The Field Target Setting​


The second series was shot with the hammer spring adjustment screw three turns in from flush.

Here we see an absolute maximum Muzzle Velocity of 1,025 FPS. That’s 19.69 Ft/Lbs Muzzle Energy and definitely Field Target legal. Hey, we got lucky first time. I’ll take it!

Barra 1100z Performance .177 Caliber


In HAM testing, we consider an Extreme Spread of 40 FPS to be “acceptably consistent” Muzzle Velocity for an unregulated air rifle. That’s because there’s no perceptible elevation difference in impact at 55 Yards – maximum Field Target range.

That means shots below 1,025 FPS and above 985 FPS count as “consistent”.

As we can see from the chart, this tune gives 23 “consistent” shots, starting at shot 38 and running to shot 61 in this string.

HAM-3-Turns-Plus-Pressure-6132115.jpg


The Muzzle Velocity/fill pressure graph above shows that our unregulated Gen. 1 Barra 1100z performance is “Field Target ready” with a fill of 2,400 PSI on this tune setting.

However, that number of consistent shots means that we’ll need to re-fill three times during the typical 60-shot match. I’m hoping to find this level of power but with a lot more consistent shots after installing the regulator.

Barra 1100z Performance Best Overall Performance​


Now for the “five turns in” setting – approximately the factory setting.

HAM-5-Turns-5706394.jpg


As we can see, this is definitely a good general-purpose tune. Again, we have 23 “consistent” shots, from shot 6 to shot 29. But this time the fill pressure would be 2,800 PSI.

However, it’s too powerful for Field Target.

HAM-5-Turns-Plus-Pressure-1691308.jpg


1100z Gen. 1 PCP Performance Comparison .177 Caliber​


Again, we’ll take the Muzzle Velocity curves for the three hammer spring settings and plot them together, we have a graphic comparison of what’s happening.

Barra 1100z Performance .177 Caliber


1100z Gen. 1 PCP Total Power Comparison​


Now let’s compare the same tune settings for our gun in .22 and .177 calibers.

Here, I calculated the Muzzle Energy for every individual shot in these tests. Adding them together for each of the tunes we can compare the total power produced for each fill of the gun from 3,000 PSI down to 1,500 PSI.

Hammer Spring SettingShots Per Fill .22 CalShots Per Fill .177 CalTotal Energy .22 CalTotal Energy .177 Cal
3 Turns In53721,070 Ft/Lbs1,166 Ft/Lbs
5 Turns In50461,135 Ft/Lbs912 Ft/Lbs
8 Turns In2831728 Ft/Lbs629 Ft/Lbs

So what happened with the “five turns in” tune in .177 caliber? There’s less shots per fill than when the gun was in .22 caliber!

I don’t know. But – hey, that’s why we test this stuff in a consistent manner at Hard Air Magazine!



In the next episode of this saga, Doug Wall moves on to install a regulator.

BUY FROM BARRA AIRGUNS:​

Barra 1100z Air Rifle


The post Unregulated Gen. 1 Barra 1100z Performance .177 Caliber appeared first on Hard Air Magazine.
 
I would think that you could flatten your bell curve quite a bit by doing a B Stately(sp?) oring? Or is that not done, or even considered anymore?
I know that Doug has certainly been thinking of this. However his direction is to install a regulator in the gun as a next step. This means that - for him - the test data shown in this post is mainly intended as a guide for the future reg pressure setting.
 
I would think that you could flatten your bell curve quite a bit by doing a B Stately(sp?) oring? Or is that not done, or even considered anymore?
I don't think that the BStaley o-ring mods are being done much anymore. It really is just a buffer on the front of the hammer. Much better results are obtained by using true SSG (stopped spring guide) AKA FFT (free flight hammer) devices to stop hammer bounce. I have done one of these on a Crosman Maximus, with very good results. This will be something that I'll explore about three articles down the line.
 
I don't think that the BStaley o-ring mods are being done much anymore. It really is just a buffer on the front of the hammer. Much better results are obtained by using true SSG (stopped spring guide) AKA FFT (free flight hammer) devices to stop hammer bounce. I have done one of these on a Crosman Maximus, with very good results. This will be something that I'll explore about three articles down the line.
Yeah, I never liked the idea actually because I know the nature of the oring to eventually wear would constantly be changing results. However, it is quick and easy to try. I only got interested in this lately with my TalonP because with such a small air supply, at such high demand for a very few shots, it makes a lot of sense. The AR-6, imported by ARS, back in '91, used a heavy rubber square dounut as a hammer restrictor that had a good lifespan, but I wasn't too thrilled with the cheap solution back then. When BStaley showed up I figured that the smaller orings wouldn't have much life at all, and never bothered. Then came sss, ssg, tss, affordable reliable regulators and the rest is history. Still makes sense for the TalonP, if you want to stay unregulated and simple, but that's about it. Another arrow in the quiver.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create FREE account

Create a FREE account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Trending in this forum

Back
Top