wolfmangreg
HAM Ranger
- Original poster
- #21
Will do!This! I run the Prochrono DLX and while it is accurate I only pull it out when there's a problem with a gun or im just VERY curious. If the lighting isnt just perfect and the stars haven't aligned, or the birds aren't chirping that day... it won't work. Who wouldn't want a chrono recording away safely out of harms way while shooting bench sessions or testing new ammo!
Thanks for the review Greg, love my Midas Tac as well....my favorite scope i reckon
If you can update this thread long-term we'd appreciate!
Have the same ProChrono model, and an older Caldwell (Ballistic Precision, I think- without BlueTooth). A lighting kit on the screens helps with both, but is a pain to set up & still isn't foolproof. Both throw errors I can never seem to fix, and just plain miss shots. The ProChrono especially struggles with .177 pellets.
@Hylander piqued my curiosity, so got both the opticals out today. Wanted to compare their results with a 50-shot string from the Athlon that was recorded a few days back, using the same rifle/ammo/tune, & in very similar weather/lighting. All started with a 230 bar fill.
Athlon: 50 shots, 50 data points. Average - 924 fps. SD - 3.2 fps. ES - 11 fps.
Caldwell: 20 shots, 18 data points. Average - 922 fps. SD - 3.6 fps. ES - 11 fps.
ProChrono: 20 shots, 17 data points. Average - 917 fps. SD - 4.2fps ES - 15 fps. ***
*** ProChrono numbers include one outlier, second shot in the string. Didn't give mulligans for the Athlon or Caldwell, so kept it.
A bit surprised that the differences are inconsequential, unless one is trying to slide in juusst under a power limit (say 20 fpe limit for field target).
The shots vs. data points numbers tell a tale, and this is with the opticals having near perfect light conditions. So does the fact that I didn't even consider doing 50 shots with either optical chrony, but would've left the Athlon on for a full tin without a second thought, if I had the time & inclination to shoot a session that long.
What you don't see in the numbers is the time & effort to set up the opticals vs the radar unit. Stark contrast.
Also want to mention- @pan60 makes a very good point. Apps are frequently updated, so there's a good chance the experience has improved significantly since some of the negative reviews. If I start having significant issues with the Athlon app, will definitely report here. If you don't see that update... safe to assume it's smooth sailing for me.


