Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

.177 Dome or Wadcutter design?

zb bb

HAM Plinker
14
63
HAM Points
182.75
Country flag
Hello All: For paper targets at short ranges, say 10 meters, do domed design pellets offer an advantage over a flat wadcutter type? At longer ranges I understand that domes show better accuracy. Has this been your experience?
 
For paper punching wadcutters are better because they cut clean holes in target paper. For accuracy, it depends on the gun. Each gun could have a favorite pellet, even at 10 yards.

If the most accurate pellets for your gun are domes, and you decided to use them for target practice at 10 yards, take a ping pong ball size piece of duct seal and flatten it into a thin pancake, like 1/16" thick and press it into the back of your target paper behind your bullseye. Then the dome will make a wadcutter like hole.
 
My experience: wadcutters are more accurate at 20yds or less. Wadcutters are deadly on squirrels with some velocity at short range. A lot of the accuracy with wadcutters is due to its match pedigree. True match quality pellets are almost always .177 wadcutters and it’s the consistency and tight tolerances that make them accurate, not the form factor. It would’ve been sacrilegious to put a domed pellet in my Feinwerkbau 300s back in the day.
 
Thanks for all the great prompt replies.
I am intrigued by the fact that on the H&N website under their Target Shooting pellets, the flat designs have 10 meters shown as max distance while the dome types show 50 meters.
Are longer distances where the dome designs show an advantage?
 
Thanks for all the great prompt replies.
I am intrigued by the fact that on the H&N website under their Target Shooting pellets, the flat designs have 10 meters shown as max distance while the dome types show 50 meters.
Are longer distances where the dome designs show an advantage?
Indeed. Domed pellets are designed just for distance. Slugs work better at extreme distances.
 
Thanks for all the great prompt replies.
I am intrigued by the fact that on the H&N website under their Target Shooting pellets, the flat designs have 10 meters shown as max distance while the dome types show 50 meters.
Are longer distances where the dome designs show an advantage?
Welcome to Ham! I have shot RWS Super Mag (9.0gr wadcutters) out of my TX200 and they hit the paper sideways😵 Not just one either, ever single pellet iirc. Distance was 40Y, and speed would have been in the low 800fps, maybe high 700s. I now wish I had tried them at 10 or 20Y! I would not recommend them past 20Y myself, go with domes then. I have a gorgeous HW50s on its way to my house.... I may just have to try it out with some med weight wadcutters @ 20Y vs some good domed pellets. Hmmm this could be a really fun experiment!
 
Thanks for all the great prompt replies.
I am intrigued by the fact that on the H&N website under their Target Shooting pellets, the flat designs have 10 meters shown as max distance while the dome types show 50 meters.
Are longer distances where the dome designs show an advantage?

In my FWB300SU, domes are better.
View attachment 17485
It’s hard to argue with those results.
 
Thanks again for the great thoughtful responses. I am a very casual air gun shooter; iron sights and short backyard distances. For now at least, I will concentrate on finding the best light flat point pellet for my old 760.
In my opinion, for what it is it has already been impressive with Crosman wadcutters but Im open to improvement and Im now trying some Excite Plinking which so far seem a touch better. I don't know if I would be able to see the benefit of even higher grade ammo with such a crude rifle and my old eyes.
zb
 
Thanks again for the great thoughtful responses. I am a very casual air gun shooter; iron sights and short backyard distances. For now at least, I will concentrate on finding the best light flat point pellet for my old 760.
In my opinion, for what it is it has already been impressive with Crosman wadcutters but Im open to improvement and Im now trying some Excite Plinking which so far seem a touch better. I don't know if I would be able to see the benefit of even higher grade ammo with such a crude rifle and my old eyes.
zb
You just never know. Experimenting is half the fun. I love it when the cheaper pellets turn out to work best in my air rifles.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create FREE account

Create a FREE account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Trending in this forum

Back
Top