if accuracy is subpar why is ther such a move to slugs?
is it just the exceptions to come and not want to miss the band wagon?
I can see some hunters wanting slugs ( not for tree rats ) for more energy.
Lots of my sourness about slugs is that I've tried to mostly shoot them from pellet guns. Often, but not always, choked barrels at reasonable power levels. And most, but not all, of my slug testing has been what I call first gen slugs. The cone shaped types. We're talking probably 50 barrels at this point. Two decent shooting barrel/slug combos. Two.
And I'll add here that this is long range accuracy I'm talking about. I live on two acres, two long skinny acres. I've got 135 yards off the back porch on my own property, and a couple hundred onto the neighbors property, and permission to shoot that direction. So new gun or barrel comes through for testing and it goes straight to the back porch for long range accuracy assessment.
What I call second gen slugs, the Altaros type, seem to offer a bit better success rate than what I've seen. Although I have tried Altaros from a couple barrels and been typical-for-slugs disappointed. So, say Altaros really are as good as folks say, and maybe/maybe not with a better success rate than I've seen with most slugs.....now you're paying 3-4x as much as we pay for even expensive JSB pellets. Which gets you into du jour rimfire specialty ammo prices.
So yes, I think some of it is not wanting to miss the bandwagon/the industry hype train pushing to get us to open our wallets.
If I NEEDED rimfire power levels, I'd shoot a rimfire. And not being a felon, would go through the necessary tax stamps to keep it quiet. As it is though, airguns are enjoyable for what they are for me, not what the industry is trying to turn them into.
To get back to the OPs original question.....I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more slugs allowed at the big industry showcase matches, cuz like I already said, consumerism. And what wins on Sunday, sells on Monday.