Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Airgun Industry Tariffs In The USA. A Business Perspective…

Status
Not open for further replies.
Airgun Industry Tariffs In The USA. A Business Perspective…


Everyone’s excited right now about the changed tariffs – both proposed and actual – being imposed by the United States. But what about airgun industry tariffs, specifically?

Firstly I need to make it clear that I am not an expert on tariffs, or any other kind of taxation. Nor am I an expert in predicting the future. If I were, I would have made a fortune on the stock market long ago…

Most importantly – this is specifically NOT a political discussion. That’s waaaay beyond my pay grade. I’m simply sticking to simple airgun business issues and things I can see from my very limited perspective.

But I do think it’s worth a discussion about what the proposed US tariff changes may mean for the airgun industry going forward. You see, it’s clear to me that tariff changes could make significant changes to the products that we buy and love to use.

Of course, the whole US tariffs issue could blow over and things to back – more or less – to normal. But personally, I’m not betting on that: at least in the short term. And, it’s possible that some tariffs could actually go down, with resulting price reductions.

Get a coffee and sit down. It’s a rather long read…


General Tariff Basics​


Tariffs are levied on the imports to a country at the place they arrive. They are paid by the importer and are part of the “landed cost” of the product concerned. Just about every country has them. They’re a part of everyday commercial life.

Historically, US tariffs have been relatively low by many international standards.

HAM looked at airgun industry economics – in an incredibly simplistic way – in this story last year. So let’s take that same $100 BB pistol that we used for our example…

In this example, I assumed our $100 BB pistol actually cost the “brand owner” $25 including shipping (from Asia) and 4% Import Duty. That would be the landed cost.

So – sticking to that $25 cost and using VERY APPROXIMATE numbers to make things easy – if there’s a 10% tariff, that will be an additional $2.50 per gun. A 20% tariff would be plus $5.00 per gun. At 100% tariff rate, the tariff would be $25.00.

But it isn’t that simple, as these costs become magnified as they pass through the distribution chain until we buy them at the final price. Again our previous story gives a basic explanation.

This means that even small changes in tariffs can have an appreciable effect on the prices we pay.


Airgun Industry Tariffs Basics​


It’s no secret that the current and proposed US tariff changes effect primarily China and other low-cost countries in the Far East.

It also seems that some large, powerful industries can exert enough leverage within the USA to have the proposed increases not apply to them. The computer industry appears to be an example of this, as we have seen in the past few days.

Many big companies have correspondingly “deep pockets”. So they can – for example – stand the cost of transferring manufacturing from one country to another if they feel they have to. But it takes time…

Large companies might also have the financial reserves to ride out the current US tariffs situation.

So it’s at this point that we need to stress that the world-wide airgun industry is a small one. It’s composed of (relatively) small manufacturers, small distributors and smaller dealers. It’s unlikely that any company in this industry has deep enough pockets to either move production or ride out a difficult economic situation.

Then there’s the issue of how much of this relatively small global market does the US represent? I don’t know the answer to this, but I’ll guess that – overall – the US represents 50% of the total world airgun market. This could be important, as we’ll discuss later…

Finally, US consumers have long been accustomed to relatively low prices for physical goods, compared to many other countries. Sure we may think we’re paying a lot for our airguns (and other stuff), but they likely are relatively more expensive in other countries.

Plus, of course, the results are going to be different for each individual company.


Airgun Industry Tariffs – High Level Guesses​


So – looking into my very cloudy crystal ball – some basic guesses could be as follows…

US-manufactured products will be relatively advantaged as their production takes place in the USA. However, it’s just about guaranteed that they include at least a few parts imported from abroad and so their costs could increase from tariffs on those parts.

Airguns imported from European Union countries and Turkey will probably suffer relatively less from US tariffs than imports from the Far East. It’s even possible that tariffs on products from these countries could end-up lower than they are today. So Germany, Spain and Turkey, for example, could benefit relatively compared to airgun manufacturers in the Far East.

Where a US “brand owner” has a high proportion of its production sourced from China or the Far East, the company could be stressed. This is particularly true if the the brand owner has the majority of its sales in the USA. That’s going to be a tough situation…

Then there are some segments of the airgun industry where – so far as I am aware – just about all of the development and manufacturing expertise is in China. HPA compressors form one obvious example. What will happen here? Dunno…

Riflescopes and just about any other optics associated with shooting are also overwhelmingly developed and manufactured in the Far East. Certainly the lower-cost ones. What will happen here? Dunno…

This is where market size can be important. Some companies may decide that they can survive by simply not selling into the USA. If they sell enough in the rest of the world, it’s possible that they can manage just fine.

So some airguns may disappear from the US market. Don’t laugh at this possibility, early indications of this are already happening in the photographic industry where FujiFilm has apparently suspended deliveries of some China-manufactured digital cameras to the US. Demand for these products is so strong in the rest of the world that they can do this and sell them elsewhere.



Those are my thoughts on changing airgun industry tariffs in the USA. Again, I’m not an expert in any of this stuff – I’m just describing what I see and can guess. And I could definitely be wrong – my wife will confirm this ;-)

But it’s clear that there will be both winners and losers in the industry we love – at least in the short term.

If you would like to comment, please do so in the spirit in which this story was written. That is, airgun- and business-related. No political stuff, please!


The post Airgun Industry Tariffs In The USA. A Business Perspective… appeared first on Hard Air Magazine.
 
Last edited:
It will all be interesting to watch and see how it plays out. In discussions with others I have found myself completely forgetting that all this is happening as I have always just "rode it out" any time theres a big rift like this. Gas prices, toilet paper shortages, anything, I just deal with it.
 
The idea is not to get "China" to move their manufacturing anywhere to avoid Tariffs, it's to get American Companies to move back to the USA from China, and to get China to remove the tariffs that are placed on USA made goods exported into China.
Read some history, they have done it before.

I think it's pretty clear that you are not in business and do not understand that companies cannot just "increase profits" to whatever they want.
A company will charge whatever it’s market segment will bear for a good or service to maximize its profits.

Yes, I have owned a small business in the past. Roughly over one million dollars in annual sales.
That "tariff/tax" money will come back. Likely not into your personal pockets, but into the pockets of your offspring and following generations. It took many years to get to the point we are now, and it will take many to get back to where we were.
Wishful thinking at best, seeing things through a filter at worst.

Tariffs are a mixed bag and typically don’t work the way they are intended. Again that is history.
 
Read some history, they have done it before.


A company will charge whatever it’s market segment will bear for a good or service to maximize its profits.

Yes, I have owned a small business in the past. Roughly over one million dollars in annual sales.

Wishful thinking at best, seeing things through a filter at worst.

Tariffs are a mixed bag and typically don’t work the way they are intended. Again that is history.

I swear a different person wrote what is above, versus what you first wrote......

"Why wouldn’t they increase their profits? It’s an obvious opportunity.

I believe the same will hold true for any domestically manufactured Airgun and related. Again why not increase profits?"


I mean someone who owned a small business would know that you couldn't just increase your profit margin.
I mean what do you think would happen if Crosman were still in the US and because Daystate or FX or other import went to $2000 and Crosman were to increase their prices to $2000? Wouldn't sell many would be my guess.
 
I mean someone who owned a small business would know that you couldn't just increase your profit margin.
Really??? I guess restructuring, market conditions, outsourcing, automation, taking advantage of different supply chain avenues, and let’s not forget innovation. So all that's just the land of make believe 😂.

I mean what do you think would happen if Crosman were still in the US and because Daystate or FX or other import went to $2000 and Crosman were to increase their prices to $2000? Wouldn't sell many would be my guess.
If what I said led you to asking me this type of question I’m afraid we are at an impasse.

No further correspondence from you will be acknowledged regarding this topic.

Good day.
 
I think things will get sorted out one way or another for the better, and now is a great time to enjoy what you have. We live in an incredible time, and many of us are lucky to be able to shoot the guns we do. It's a great hobby and it's a great way to meet friends. The same was true last month and the same will be true now.

This was a great article to give consumers a little snippet of some of the backdoor dealings industry folk have to navigate, but I wouldn't be worried about it as a consumer. Just have fun and make some friends along the way.
 
I think things will get sorted out one way or another for the better, and now is a great time to enjoy what you have. We live in an incredible time, and many of us are lucky to be able to shoot the guns we do. It's a great hobby and it's a great way to meet friends. The same was true last month and the same will be true now.

This was a great article to give consumers a little snippet of some of the backdoor dealings industry folk have to navigate, but I wouldn't be worried about it as a consumer. Just have fun and make some friends along the way.
Tristan, thanks for your input and perspective, as always (y)
 
Here's another story on tariffs...
Australia used to have tariffs on car imports, to protect our "local" car manufacturing industry (Ford & GM/Holden)- I say "local" as it was always a bit of a joke how much was actually made here.
The old man would get a new car every 1.5-2years, always the standard model Holden commodore.
They were absolute garbage - horrible quality, handled like boats, incredibly poor on accessories compared to other vehicles available at the time.
The unions kept striking - they ended up getting $30/hr (15-20yr ago) for the lowest entry level jobs for Holden... Ford guys were getting $50/hr. So the companies kept getting handouts from the government to stay afloat.
Both companies left Australia, took all their grants with them too.
We now have no local industry, no tariffs, and much MUCH better cars at cheaper prices these days.
 
Here's another story on tariffs...
Australia used to have tariffs on car imports, to protect our "local" car manufacturing industry (Ford & GM/Holden)- I say "local" as it was always a bit of a joke how much was actually made here.
The old man would get a new car every 1.5-2years, always the standard model Holden commodore.
They were absolute garbage - horrible quality, handled like boats, incredibly poor on accessories compared to other vehicles available at the time.
The unions kept striking - they ended up getting $30/hr (15-20yr ago) for the lowest entry level jobs for Holden... Ford guys were getting $50/hr. So the companies kept getting handouts from the government to stay afloat.
Both companies left Australia, took all their grants with them too.
We now have no local industry, no tariffs, and much MUCH better cars at cheaper prices these days.

Actually, from what I read, it seems it was the reduction of those Tariffs over the years that caused those companies to leave. When the Tariff was 45% there were 10 Auto Companies producing in Australia. As the rate declined over the years to 15% and then 10%, those protections disappeared as did the Auto producing companies. By 2016 there were only 3 left. At the end of 2017 there were none.......


 
Actually, from what I read, it seems it was the reduction of those Tariffs over the years that caused those companies to leave. When the Tariff was 45% there were 10 Auto Companies producing in Australia. As the rate declined over the years to 15% and then 10%, those protections disappeared as did the Auto producing companies. By 2016 there were only 3 left. At the end of 2017 there were none.......
Absolutely - tariffs were a significant factor in allowing companies to produce incredibly poor products, that were significantly actually made elsewhere - assembly of the final product was done here, but the parts were manufactured elsewhere, and the % of imported parts was incredibly high.
They were also quite un-safe, due to lacking quality features (i.e. disc brakes), we also made our own crash test standards (not adopting the EU standards) because the "local" cars scored so poorly, but with our standards that 3 stars turned into 5/5! It was all a joke tbh
 
Absolutely - tariffs were a significant factor in allowing companies to produce incredibly poor products, that were significantly actually made elsewhere - assembly of the final product was done here, but the parts were manufactured elsewhere, and the % of imported parts was incredibly high.
They were also quite un-safe, due to lacking quality features (i.e. disc brakes), we also made our own crash test standards (not adopting the EU standards) because the "local" cars scored so poorly, but with our standards that 3 stars turned into 5/5! It was all a joke tbh

Ok, didn't realize you agreed it was the lack of Tariff's that made them leave. The Tariff's allowed them to produce the goods; they did not cause them to be poor products. That would have been on the Australian workers.
 
I don’t think this will bring any sizable manufacturing back here. The whole thing is all over the place causing complete confusion in the markets. One day we are going to slap the whole world in the face. Which would have been an utterly horrible idea. Then it’s just China at 145%. Then there are these and that exceptions. Now it’s come out well the tariffs won’t be 145%…not that high but significant 🤷‍♂️. No one is moving anything under those circumstances. Plus think of the costs involved in doing that when down the road it will most certainly change. Will just have to see how this plays out I guess. I will say again though kudos to this forum for having this thread A+. Even the mention of it on AGN and its immediate closure. Really wish this place would get as busy as over there.
 
No one is moving anything under those circumstances.


John Deere already folded and kept their plants here in the United States vs the move to Mexico they were going to do,

Hyundai has already started investing.

I know we live in a world of convenience stores, amazon next day deliveries and information at our fingertips in seconds, however that doesn't translate to everything. Everyone whined the egg prices and fuel prices didn't drop the first week of the new administrations presence in office, well, eggs are down 53% and fuel costs have dropped significantly at this point.

But, anyways, thats my .02 and thats all I got , not wanting to turn this too far from original topic.
 
John Deere already folded and kept their plants here in the United States vs the move to Mexico they were going to do,

Hyundai has already started investing.

I know we live in a world of convenience stores, amazon next day deliveries and information at our fingertips in seconds, however that doesn't translate to everything. Everyone whined the egg prices and fuel prices didn't drop the first week of the new administrations presence in office, well, eggs are down 53% and fuel costs have dropped significantly at this point.
I would say stopping a move while a great thing is different than bringing over seas operations here. I don’t know though. Certainly not even remotely an expert in this area. Just a dumb truck driver …lol. I would love to see it happen believe me and something needs to be done with China for sure. They are a geopolitical enemy through and through. Just the execution has to be done correctly. Glad to hear of the backing down from 145%. Don’t think that is a reasonable starting point. Thank god slapping the whole world, thus incentivizing more countries to align with China was aborted. In my opinion that would have been a train wreck. Isolating China I feel is a better approach.
 
I don’t think this will bring any sizable manufacturing back here. The whole thing is all over the place causing complete confusion in the markets. One day we are going to slap the whole world in the face. Which would have been an utterly horrible idea. Then it’s just China at 145%. Then there are these and that exceptions. Now it’s come out well the tariffs won’t be 145%…not that high but significant 🤷‍♂️. No one is moving anything under those circumstances. Plus think of the costs involved in doing that when down the road it will most certainly change. Will just have to see how this plays out I guess. I will say again though kudos to this forum for having this thread A+. Even the mention of it on AGN and its immediate closure. Really wish this place would get as busy as over there.
AGN is the new Yellow...
 
@Linehauler73 the discussion here on HAM imo is far more fruitful and beneficial to airgunners. Its a pretty good place over here, its why I try to push hard for people to sign up and start communicating. Airgunning is a niche hobby and some of us live where the only people we can converse with are people on the forums, I too would like to see it get busier!
 
I will say again though kudos to this forum for having this thread A+. Even the mention of it on AGN and its immediate closure. Really wish this place would get as busy as over there.

Thanks for that! To me this seems an important issue for the airgun world and so suitable for debate.

Thanks also to everyone for keeping it (relatively) close to the original airgun focus and for keeping the discussion politics-free.
 
We could possibly see a change in markets, since things from outside the US will get more expensive !

China will probably try to look for other places to expand their business - 12.6 % of their exports goes to the US

Everything will get more expensive for you guys in the States !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending in this forum

Back
Top