Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

50 Years With Diana Air Rifles – Part One

Last edited:
1727559237194.png

This is a very different HAM Review! In it, Doug Wall takes us through 50 years with Diana air rifles. He compares his Diana 27S from 1974 with a brand-new classic air rifle, the Diana 34 EMS of 2024.

Take it away Doug…



50 Years With Diana Air Rifles – How I Started​


Why 50 years? That was my first Diana. It was 1974, I was in my mid-twenties, and after already having been an airgun shooter for a decade, I wanted something better.

The “European” type spring piston airguns had been around the US for a few years, but the market was dominated by Crosman, Benjamin, and Daisy.

Since that was way before the internet, the process for finding, and buying things was a lot harder and longer. First of all, you had to find the companies selling things (Air Rifle Headquarters and Beeman were the big ones) which was usually from an ad in a magazine.

Next, you had to request a catalog, either by phone or mail. The catalog would arrive in a week or two, and then you could pick out what you wanted to order, fill out an order form, and mail it in along with a check. After about three weeks or so, your order would show up.

50 Years With Diana Air Rifles - The Diana Model 27S



50 Years With Diana Air Rifles – The Diana Model 27S​


Over the years, Dianas have been labeled with several brand names. Some of these were; “Original” in Germany, “Diana Original” in England, Beeman, Hy-Score and Winchester in the USA and “GECADO” (Geco).

My choice was a Diana (labeled Geco) 27S. This was an upgraded version of the original Diana 27. Diana first started making the Model 27 in 1910.

This gun had a wooden butt stock, but no forearm. After World War II, they added a full length stock. The Model 27S added an updated stock design, rubber butt pad, and articulated cocking arm.

As I understand it, these changes were made to make the guns more competitive to the HW models. I’ve often thought that the Model 27S to be the Diana equivalent to the HW30.

Right from the start, this gun was a joy to shoot! It was easy to cock, quiet, and very accurate. It had plenty of power for squirrels and pest birds.

HAM-Doug-7-4569181.jpg


I originally mounted a 4×20 scope on it. While this was an improvement over the 4×15 riflescope that I had on my Crosman, it was, by today’s standards, a pretty inadequate optic.

My Model 27S has worn a few different scopes over the 50 years. It currently sports a CenterPoint 3-9×40 AO scope, which seems about right for this rifle.

Over the years, this gun has had very few problems. At one point, many years ago, I did upgrade from a leather seal to a synthetic seal, and put in a new OEM (or equivalent) spring at the same time. The typical regimen of lubricants has been renewed a couple of times.

That’s all!


50 Years With Diana Air Rifles – Shooting The Model 27S​


But let’s get to the real nitty gritty – what’s it like to shoot! This gun is fairly lightweight. My gun, with a muzzle weight and the CenterPoint scope, weighs in at 7 Lbs 13 Oz.

HAM-Doug-1-5470965.jpg


Cocking effort is quite low at about 17 Lbs. This is a gun that you can shoot all day without getting a tired arm!

The sear is one of the famous Diana ball bearing sears. The trigger on mine is a two-stage unit, with a very crisp second stage at about 2 Lb. 9 Oz..

The Diana 27S has an anti-beartrap mechanism. This also acts somewhat as a safety for me. If the barrel is broken open at all, the gun won’t fire.

This mechanism also presents a minor problem, in that the only way to un-cock the gun is to fire it. That just means that you have to have a place to fire off a waste shot.

Below. One interesting feature about the Model 27S is the very short cut-out in the underside of the stock’s forearm. This is due to Diana’s articulated cocking mechanism.

HAM-Doug-9-4336313.jpg


Just for comparison purposes, I decided to run this gun through our standard Hard Air Magazine testing protocol. I just wanted to see how a 50 year old gun would stack up against the modern guns.

Needless to say, this gun is no powerhouse. The power ranges from about 6.6 Ft/Lbs (529 FPS) with a heavy 10.65 Grain pellet, to about 8.0 Ft/Lbs (811 FPS) with a light 5.5 Grain pellet.

PelletAverage Muzzle VelocityAverage Muzzle EnergyAccuracy
Predator GTO 5.0 Grain811 FPS8.04 Ft/LbsExcellent.
H&N Field Target Trophy Green 5.56 Grain756 FPS7.05 Ft/LbsExcellent.
RWS Hobby 7.0 Grain678 FPS7.15 Ft/LbsExcellent
Crosman Premier HP 7.9 Grain623 FPS6.80 Ft/LbsExcellent.
JSB Exact Diabalo 8.44 Grain648 FPS6.88 Ft/LbsExcellent.
H&N Field Target Trophy 8.64 Grain609 FPS7.12 Ft/LbsExcellent. Best Tested.
H&N Baracuda Match 10.65 Grain529 FPS6.61 Ft/LbsExcellent.

50 Years With Diana Air Rifles – Model 27S Accuracy​


It has been a while since I really did any target shooting with this gun, and I had somewhat forgotten what kind of fantastic accuracy I could get with this gun!

50 Years With Diana Air Rifles - Model 27S Accuracy


In this set of tests, the best group that I got was about 0.22 In. x 0.12 In CTC. (10 shots, 10 Yards with H&N Field Target Trophies). As you can see from the test targets, couple of other types of pellets also approached this level of accuracy.

As you can see, even the worst group (10 shots, H&N Baracuda Match) was a very creditable 0.47 In. x 0.23 In. CTC. This is better than the best groups that I’ve gotten with some modern guns!

HAM-DOUGS-DIANA0004-3837209.jpg


HAM-DOUGS-DIANA0001-4849102.jpg


HAM-DOUGS-DIANA-6167864.jpg


HAM-DOUGS-DIANA0003-5710582.jpg


HAM-DOUGS-DIANA0002-9082313.jpg


HAM-DOUGS-DIANA0006-3080244.jpg


Editor’s note. After 50 years, both Doug and his Diana can still really shoot :)

As part of this project, I will also be making a quick evaluation of the current Diana 34EMS in .22 cal. This is a different gun from the .177 caliber model that was reviewed in HAM in Jan., 2021.

We’ll look at that next time…



Thanks Doug! We’ll all be looking forward to the second part of your experience of 50 years with Diana air rifles.


The post 50 Years With Diana Air Rifles – Part One appeared first on Hard Air Magazine.
 
As much as I love my pcps I do wonder how/if they will perform after 50 years!? Very impressive accuracy, and... I am blown away by how light that thing is for being so long and well built! Most well made newer springers, decked out with a scope and rings will be easily 10lbs plus all-in nowadays.
Most of the newer springers are twice (or more) the power, so it stands to reason they're heavier. And weight is good unless you're drowning.
As for PCP future performance, it's the same as springers. It depends on the condition of the seals. I have know doubt future HAM will have articles where a 50 year old 3622, Notos, or Avenger is compared to a then current model.
 
Last edited:
Most of the newer springers are twice (or more) the power, so it stands to reason they're heavier. And weight is good unless you're drowning.
As for PCP future performance, it's the same as springers. It depends on the condition of the seals. I have know doubt future HAM will have articles where a 50 year old 3622, Notos, or Avenger is compared to a then current model.
The struggle with pcps that no other guns deal with really is the air tube/bottle survivability in my mind. Degas, strip down/inspect or replace every 10 to 12 years is current industry standard recommendation. Avaliablility of parts would be a number 2 concern. Moisture ingress left long enough can do irreparable damage. Absolutely agree that many pcps could do 50 years with proper care but it might not be the norm, price of a new tank, full reseal is comparable to a whole new gun on many cheaper models. Lastly I'd guess in 50 years we are all gone.... a neglected springer in a closet should still shoot. A leaked down pcp is just a nice looking paper weight. But I hope your right! Wondering if the moderator on Doug's rifle is stock or an add on?
 
The struggle with pcps that no other guns deal with really is the air tube/bottle survivability in my mind. Degas, strip down/inspect or replace every 10 to 12 years is current industry standard recommendation. Avaliablility of parts would be a number 2 concern. Moisture ingress left long enough can do irreparable damage. Absolutely agree that many pcps could do 50 years with proper care but it might not be the norm, price of a new tank, full reseal is comparable to a whole new gun on many cheaper models. Lastly I'd guess in 50 years we are all gone.... a neglected springer in a closet should still shoot. A leaked down pcp is just a nice looking paper weight. But I hope your right! Wondering is the moderator on Doug's rifle is stock or an add on?
Hi Danman,
This 27S is so quiet, it doesn't need a moderator. The thing on the muzzle is just a weight to help steady the light weight.
 
Great report. I too can attest that a 50 year old springer can still shoot. I was a young USAF officer stationed at Izmir Turkey Sept 1972 -1974, and saw a what I thought was a high grade springer at our NATO rod and gun club. All the Turkish clerks were cocking and dry firing it. I was interested but passed, and in retrospect am glad I did so, not knowing anything about them at the time. When I got back to my new assignement in the states one of the other officers in the hospital where we worked was already into air guns and loaned me an Air Rifle Headquarters catalog, the one from W. Va. I studied it for a couple of weeks and decided on a Feinwerkbau 124d, which I still have. In the ensuing 49-50 years it has had new springs and seals installed. It is the easiest cocking and one of the most accurate of all my air guns, all springers, including some HW, Air Arms and one Diana model. I recently came across one on ebay and it sounded good, so added it to my collection. It was described as having been recently tuned and upon shooting it I believe that to be true. It did not have any sights, so I put a front globe and a receiver sight on it, as I really like this size and weight gun with iron sights, most of my air guns having diopter sights. I fully expect to pass these guns on to my son and grandson some day, and just hope that they will take care of them as I have over the years.
 
Great write up, and a trip down memory lane. It was indeed a lot harder to get a hold of stuff, and information, back in the day! The H&N FTT is the most accurate pellet out of my FWB124D's too. Springers seem to really do well with those, particularly German ones.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create FREE account

Create a FREE account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Trending in this forum

Back
Top