Search results

I fill cardboard box(es) with Vigoro rubber "mulch". They are light and portable and low cost and reusable... and so far they easy stop 177 at ~33 ft-lbf and 22 at 55+ ft-lbf pellets within ~ 1 to 1.5" depth..haven't found pellets deeper than 1.5" and this is at 30 yards...easy to separate the...

The H&N Baracuda Match in my 177 HP Ghost are the most precise so far...the JSBs all have more fliers....I had some old Beeman Silver Jets left over from back in the days when I was trying to find an accurate pellet for my R9 (which ended up being the H&N BM)....they did not group well at all...

~30 ft-lbf?

So the top dovetail “plate” doesn’t cover them?

Team Revere Moderator Question: My 22 came with the 0 dB...and it is significantly louder than my 22 HP Ghost with the Koi....and way louder than the Ghost in 177 set up... Is there a consensus regarding what is the best moderator(s) for the 22 Revere?

My 22 Revere is also came set at 190 bar, and AoA recommended the JSB Exact Jumbos, which it loves and fires them ~890 ft/s; 28 ft-lbf. at ~35 yards on bench pads....its one ragged hole... Having a higher reg pressure and backing off the hammer spring is more efficient use of air, as the air...

Do you have to remove the bottle to tighten/loosen the clamp to change barrels?

Ok thank you. So for me, switching back and forth from 177 to 22 ...the clamp makes sense, but the tensioner not so much

So ....this clamp-tensioner system is "non-repeatable" ...in that if I set up - tune say 177HP with H&N Baracuda Match....then the following week I want to shoot 22HP MRDs....you have to basically start from scratch...and "re-tune" ...you could use a torque wrench on the clamp screws and tighten...

Mis read the BRK advert...thought you could "tune" ...so this just changes your "tune" by more tightly clamping the barrel at that location...this adds precision because it reduces? the magnitude of the vibration(s)? And can be used in combination with the new barrel tensioning system?

Oh I totally misunderstood…so replaces this? And is just allows for the barrel to be clamped vs held “in place” by o-rings?

It looks to me like it's just a 1 dimensional friction-fit? with the carbon fibre shroud or does it not make contact with shroud?....What do you think the two tapped holes in the "top" are for? IF I understand this, this is just a moveable weight that you can clamp at to be experimentally...

Yep…why i didnt order one. I would expect someone “local” will reverse engineer one for a lot less

I got $170 off of brk site for barrel sleeve tensioner and converted it to US $. The barrel clamp device that allows you to keep the vented shroud is like 70ish pounds

haha that clearly takes more $$$ and time than I have ...but I absolutely hate to miss....and that is what drives me

well....for me it was easy... 22 barrel kit for ~$500 or a .22 Ghost, scope etc for >$3k...going from 117 HP to 22HP is a matter of looking at my notes for the pellet(s) I want to shoot, then putting in the appropriate Hammer Spring and changing the barrel out, adjusting the Power Wheel all can...

Team Ghost, hoping someone who gets the Barrel Harmonic system will post before and after precision differences...so I can show the boss ....see if I spend another ~$175 on top of the >$3k I have already spent on this rifle set up I can make these 5 holes closer together.....

yes....just thinking-guessing about the variables in that "harmonic equation", temperature, plenum pressure-shot duration, pellet mass, pellet velocity, barrel length, weight distribution on that barrel, etc...and I would imagine that unless you weight and size sort your pellets first...putting...

So would you attribute Solo1's POI change due more to harmonics than actual barrel to scope angle change? What is your opinion on the recent BRK barrel harmonics kit? Has anyone generated before and after data? thanks again to Solo1 and you for the brain food...haha tc

Good thing I didn't see this before I went to bed...been chewing on this all morning...simplified math...says that to raise the POI by 1/2"?...the orientation of the barrel vs the line of sight of the scope...the barrel would have to change its angle relative to the scope line of sight, which...